top of page
Search
Writer's picturelwvlincolncountyor

The Informed Voter: a follow-up to our presentation.

Tonight was a success, in spite of technical issues with the internet in Lincoln City which caused us to move to the Newport campus at the last minute. Our deepest thanks to Jean Cowan for taking the lead while Georgia is healing at home. Chloe Acosta was inspirational and highly informational! Handouts were provided in-person, but we want to make sure that these links reach as many of our friends as possible.


We have all felt the effects of the onslaught of mis and disinformation online and in the news. As we draw close to election day, we want accurate, factual information. Chloe, of the Youth Council of the League of Women Voters, has compiled her presented tools for us to add to our personal toolboxes.


Nonpartisan Election Information Sites

  • Vote411, nonpartisan election local, state, and national election information site from the League of Women Voters

  • Project Vote Smart, a citizen's organization providing free, accurate, and unbiased information for electoral decision-making

Fact-Check Sites

  • Politifact, a Pulitzer Prize winning fact-checking website run by editors and reporters from the Tampa Bay Times

  • FactCheck, a project of the nonpartisan Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania that fact-checks statements of major U.S. political players in the form of TV ads, debates, speeches, interviews, and news releases

  • OpenSecrets, a nonprofit, nonpartisan research group tracking money in U.S. politics and its effect on elections and public policy

  • Fact Checker (Washington Post), a website and accompanying column in the Sunday print edition of The Washington Post that fact-checks statements by local, national, and international political figures

  • Snopes, an internet reference source for urban legends, folklore, myths, rumors, and misinformation

  • Google Fact Check, search tool to fact-check topics or people:  

Becoming a Better Information Consumer

  • News Literacy Project, offers tools and education:

    • Sign up for RumorGuard

    • Checkology:  e-learning platform to learn how to identify credible information, seek out reliable sources, and know what to trust, what to dismiss, and what to debunk.

    • Sign up for free newsletter:  Get Smart About News

  • Allsides

    • Balanced news from the left, right, and center

    • Misinformation Watch:  How to Spot Misinformation, Fact-Check of Recent News

    • Media Bias Chart 

  • Election Disinformation Tipline:  Common Cause Education Fund

AI and Election Integrity



Of Election Information
Do's and Don'ts
 

Jean Cowan brought up a few of our local measures that are deserving of further thought. As promised, we are including the statement of the League position on one of those measures here for your consideration.


Measure 117 is a benefit to ALL Oregon voters.


The League of Women Voters of Oregon represents members in communities throughout our state.

For over 100 years, we in the League have volunteered to empower voters, protect the ballot and

defend democracy.

We are a fiercely-nonpartisan organization in that we never support or oppose candidates or parties. Yet, we may advocate for topics we judge will serve all voters. We believe that Measure 117, incorporating Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) into our elections, is one of those issues.


Our decision to support any matter is taken only after studying the subject from all perspectives and

in-depth (often 2 years). In this case, following our state studies on electoral systems, we concluded

that Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) results in the best indication of voters’ preferences. Back-up choices employed by RCV eliminate the pressure to vote for a less-favored candidate. Of all the possible improvements to our current election system, Ranked Choice Voting is the preferred method.


Measure 117 offers the same benefits to local Oregon cities and counties, as it includes a local

election reform option. We join Leagues in other states and communities around the nation who

support, or are already experiencing Ranked Choice Voting advantages. Advantages such as more

voter choice, majority winners, eliminating the spoiler effect within our current election method, and

encouraging more civility with less mud-slinging.


In support of robust voter education, we encourage a deeper understanding of Measure 117, and the improvements it offers. We stand ready to participate in public education and teaching voters about the power of a back-up vote with Ranked Choice Voting.


The League of Women Voters of Oregon joins leaders from our local leagues in supporting this

measure:


Deschutes County

Lincoln County

Linn County Unit

Marion & Polk Counties

Portland

Rogue Valley


Join us in Voting YES on Measure 117.

There are strong reasons to support Ranked Choice Voting through

Measure 117. Chief among them is its effect on lessening polarization.

Extreme polarization is concerning in America, even in Oregon.

With the current election system, too often candidates are rewarded for

bad behavior, amplifying divisiveness, partisan rancor, and rigid

ideologies. This short-circuits productive discussion and promotes “us

versus them” attitudes. The goal becomes winning at all costs – not

compromising for the good of the people.

With Ranked Choice Voting (RCV), campaigns tend to be more civil,

since it benefits candidates to seek support beyond their base. A

candidate must not only win a voter’s first choice, but also appeal to

those who would rank them 2nd or 3rd. With RCV, candidates must court

all voters. They must broaden their positions, speak about policy, and

curb highly partisan rhetoric.

There’s more. Advantages of Ranked Choice Voting clearly benefit all

voters.

● Majority rule is a fundamental principle of a democratic republic.

Measure 117 ensures that winning candidates capture broad,

majority support.

● Tested and proven, RCV respects one person, one vote. It simply

uses one ballot choice as the active vote at any one time.

● The League believes in ‘sincere’ voting without needing to be

‘strategic.’ Voters can express true preferences, knowing further

choices never hurt their favorite candidate. They need not

strategize as to how their ballot could protect or hurt their favorite

choices.

 

Are you registered to vote?

  • Yes

  • No


16 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Commentaires


Post: Blog2_Post
bottom of page